Bill Gates warns to the world to prepare for bioterrorism.

This is not a question of if, but when.

I guess if Bill Gates says it people will pay more attention. Biological and chemical weapons are considered weapons of mass destruction, part of the triad with nukes, but they get a lot less press. There’s also the fact that they’ve rarely been used, even by militaries, mainly because they haven’t been very useful. They tend to be as dangerous to the employer as the target. They kill and maim indiscriminately.

But that’s no longer true, particularly for bio-weapons. Now that DNA has been decoded, weapons can be targeted to attack only people with certain codes. Think specific ethnic groups. The reality is, bioweapons will be favored over more crude destructive weapons such as nukes or even conventional weapons, because they will incapacitate/kill while leaving the infrastructure intact. Almost the perfect weapon.

They exist, thus they will be used. In the same manner we will see a nuclear detonation. They exist, one, at least, will be used. The most likely target for a nuke is in a cargo container in a port city. For bioterrorism, look at any terrorist group that is battling along ethnic lines.

Here’s the link to the article where Gates talks about it. But don’t go away quite yet.

Even without bioterrorism, the threat of a pandemic is also lurking. The last really, really bad one was 1917, when 50 to 100 million people died. While the article says a new pandemic will be contained better, I tend to disagree. In 1917 one couldn’t get on a plane on one side of the world and end on the other within 24 hours. If it’s a very fast pandemic, we’re in big trouble.

So here’s how to deal with both:

 

1 Comment

  1. Bob, you’re so right — a highly infectious disease could spread much more rapidly nowadays just because of faster travel. Add in the over-population the planet now has and the simple fact of more people living closer together would also help an infectious disease spread rapidly.

    I live in a rural area that, to me, has about three times the number of people it should and there is quite a bit of distance from our house to other houses, so I do have a buffer zone. But . . . I still have to work and shop and those are always iffy situations, especially with the number of food workers I’ve seen the past year or two who should definitely have NOT been around food.

Leave a Reply

© 2017 Bob Mayer

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

%d bloggers like this: